🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

A letter obtained by media originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting modifications of a proposed legislation that include lowering the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Recently, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of business advocacy globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “following international recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the legislation is approved.

International experts in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least half of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for various offences “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

In the letter, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary claims the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but claims that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We reside in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my property and harvest that and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator said: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Further, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which allow for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to accomplish desired population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, noting that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which includes increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.