🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations was effective, and shared fresh requests had come from intermediaries to restart negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran could not yet authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Course

Araghchi is treading a complex path since Iran does not want appear to be acting from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The previous five rounds of talks between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that ended with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been destroyed. Subsequently, European countries used their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Iranian officials stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in various formats if talks reopen.

The US president in recent days said he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting clear proposals from the United States either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the dispute could not be ended by armed force. He stated the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Dialogue Remains the Final Solution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly tried to enforce their desires during the discussions. Dialogue can still be viable and stays the primary solution to settle disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they address to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and honor, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained many lessons from this conflict; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He continued: "We effectively endured this war. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The nation of Iran have developed stronger, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the face of this assault."