🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering the team's most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Conflict Regarding System and Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director who having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later discard them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.